Setbacks in Middle East weigh on US leader’s policy
Güncelleme Tarihi:
The Associated Press
Oluşturulma Tarihi: Haziran 16, 2009 00:00
WASHINGTON - President Ahmadinejad's victory in Iran and the harsh tone of Israeli PM Netanyahu's speech on the peace process are likely to slow progress on the U.S. President Obama’s ambition of changing the landscape across the Mideast.
The re-election of Iran's hard-line president and a tough speech by Israel's hawkish prime minister signaled an increasingly difficult road ahead for President Barack Obama's hopes for ending Tehran's nuclear threat and brokering peace between Israel and the Palestinians.
A setback on either foreign policy front would have been unwelcome in the Obama’s White House, but difficulties on both issues - which are deeply entangled - were likely to slow progress on the president's ambition of changing the landscape across the Middle East.
Vice President Joe Biden said Sunday that Obama's effort to engage Tehran after a nearly three-decade estrangement would continue, nevertheless. Obama, shifting course from his predecessor, has said he wants to talk to the theocratic regime in Tehran, with the central goal of stopping it from producing a nuclear weapon. He has set a year-end deadline for a positive response to his overture.
Biden told NBC television on Sunday that the administration was still examining whether Friday's vote in Iran accurately reflected a response to Obama's desire for engagement. "That's the question," Biden said. "Is this the result of the Iranian people's wishes? The hope is that the Iranian people, all their votes have been counted, they've been counted fairly. But look, we just don't know enough."
Open dispute
In Jerusalem, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in an unusually open dispute with Obama over the path to peace with the Palestinians, the Israeli leader gave a major speech that was bound to have found a disappointed White House audience.
Obama is pressing the hard-line Netanyahu, who first served as the Israeli leader during President Bill Clinton's administration in the 1990s, to freeze settlement activity on land that the Palestinians claim for a future state. Netanyahu also had been refusing to commit to the concept of a two-state solution to the decades-long confrontation.
He gave ground on a possible Palestinian state in the Sunday speech but set preconditions that likely close off progress before talks can begin. He said any future Palestinian state would have to be disarmed and that the Palestinians must recognize Israel as the "state of the Jewish people."
Neither precondition was likely to find acceptance across the breadth of the Palestinian political spectrum, which, like the land that would become a state, is divided between Gaza - run by the Islamists Hamas - and the West Bank, controlled by the moderate Fatah organization. The White House sought to put a positive spin on the Netanyahu remarks. Spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama "believes this solution can and must ensure both Israel's security and the fulfillment of the Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for a viable state.
Hamas is strongly backed by Iran and, like Ahmadinejad, calls for the destruction of Israel. Netanyahu and his backers see Israel as threatened on three fronts, all of them arising in Tehran. The Islamic regime's perceived drive to build a nuclear bomb is viewed by Netanyahu as an existential threat to Israel. Lesser but more immediate dangers are seen to lie with Hamas and Hezbollah, Iran's other proxy organization in the region.
The two groups have routinely conducted harassing rocket attacks and incursions on Israel from Gaza in the south and Lebanon to the north, respectively.
Counterbalancing the weekend's discouraging news, however, was Hezbollah's major and unforeseen setback in Lebanese elections last week. There also is growing concern in the larger Arab Middle East about Iran's nuclear program. While Ahmadinejad's victory and the tone of Netanyahu's speech were not unexpected, a different outcome could have spurred quicker and more vigorous movement toward a broader peace in the region - a key foreign policy goal for Obama.
A setback on either foreign policy front would have been unwelcome in the Obama’s White House, but difficulties on both issues - which are deeply entangled - were likely to slow progress on the president's ambition of changing the landscape across the Middle East.
Vice President Joe Biden said Sunday that Obama's effort to engage Tehran after a nearly three-decade estrangement would continue, nevertheless. Obama, shifting course from his predecessor, has said he wants to talk to the theocratic regime in Tehran, with the central goal of stopping it from producing a nuclear weapon. He has set a year-end deadline for a positive response to his overture.
Biden told NBC television on Sunday that the administration was still examining whether Friday's vote in Iran accurately reflected a response to Obama's desire for engagement. "That's the question," Biden said. "Is this the result of the Iranian people's wishes? The hope is that the Iranian people, all their votes have been counted, they've been counted fairly. But look, we just don't know enough."
Open dispute
In Jerusalem, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in an unusually open dispute with Obama over the path to peace with the Palestinians, the Israeli leader gave a major speech that was bound to have found a disappointed White House audience.
Obama is pressing the hard-line Netanyahu, who first served as the Israeli leader during President Bill Clinton's administration in the 1990s, to freeze settlement activity on land that the Palestinians claim for a future state. Netanyahu also had been refusing to commit to the concept of a two-state solution to the decades-long confrontation.
He gave ground on a possible Palestinian state in the Sunday speech but set preconditions that likely close off progress before talks can begin. He said any future Palestinian state would have to be disarmed and that the Palestinians must recognize Israel as the "state of the Jewish people."
Neither precondition was likely to find acceptance across the breadth of the Palestinian political spectrum, which, like the land that would become a state, is divided between Gaza - run by the Islamists Hamas - and the West Bank, controlled by the moderate Fatah organization. The White House sought to put a positive spin on the Netanyahu remarks. Spokesman Robert Gibbs said Obama "believes this solution can and must ensure both Israel's security and the fulfillment of the Palestinians' legitimate aspirations for a viable state.
Hamas is strongly backed by Iran and, like Ahmadinejad, calls for the destruction of Israel. Netanyahu and his backers see Israel as threatened on three fronts, all of them arising in Tehran. The Islamic regime's perceived drive to build a nuclear bomb is viewed by Netanyahu as an existential threat to Israel. Lesser but more immediate dangers are seen to lie with Hamas and Hezbollah, Iran's other proxy organization in the region.
The two groups have routinely conducted harassing rocket attacks and incursions on Israel from Gaza in the south and Lebanon to the north, respectively.
Counterbalancing the weekend's discouraging news, however, was Hezbollah's major and unforeseen setback in Lebanese elections last week. There also is growing concern in the larger Arab Middle East about Iran's nuclear program. While Ahmadinejad's victory and the tone of Netanyahu's speech were not unexpected, a different outcome could have spurred quicker and more vigorous movement toward a broader peace in the region - a key foreign policy goal for Obama.